Day 01 - 10 June

Registration & Snacks

Welcome

Olivier de Matos

Director General, CropLife Europe

Session 1: Regulation 396/2005 and the routine MRL setting process

EU MRL setting – the routine process

· Description of different routine MRL setting processes i.e. art. 6 including timelines
· Steps where stakeholders can get information and access documents
· What changed since March 2021 by introducing transparency regulation and IUCLID
· Default MRL policy
· How to streamline MRL setting process?
· ALARA principle
· Rules for applicability of new MRLs

Dave Parker

Technical Expert - Consumer Risk Assessment, Syngenta

Regulation 396/2005 – open items after 20 years

· Annex I category feed and fish
· Annex VI – processing factors
· Dual use and triple use a.s.
· Former a.s. still falling under 396/2005
· Annex IV and biopesticides
· Footnote 1 to Annex I
· Multiple source substances

Dave Parker

Technical Expert - Consumer Risk Assessment, Syngenta

Relevance of MRLs and other SPS topics for FVC

· Sanitary and phytosanitary topics of relevance

Dave Parker

Technical Expert - Consumer Risk Assessment, Syngenta

Q+A

Coffee Break

Session 2: MRL changes

Non-renewed and expired substances in the EU and their consequences on MRLs

· Reasons for MRL changes, especially lowering of MRLs, e.g. expiry, non-renewals, targeted reviews, art. 12
· Process and rules
· Deferral period and transitional measures
· WTO SPS obligations
· Steps where stakeholders can learn about upcoming MRL changes
· New wording for transitional measures and consequences for EU and non-EU produced food and feed
· Consideration of aspects like consumer safety and “formal” MRL changes

When politics comes into a technical process

· Current observations like no opinion in SCoPAFF and objections by EP
· How to deal with current pressure from different angles
· Environmental concerns of global dimension
· Consequences of losing MRLs for trade
· Level playing field argument
· Mirror measure discussions and potential impacts
· WTO SPS obligations
· Why using the MRL process to address 1107/2009 issues
· Current Specific trade concern discussion at WTO on MRLs

Q+A

Impact of MRL changes to Value Chain partners

· How to keep EU market attractive enough for third country operators?
· Dependency of EU agriculture on import and export
· Discrepancies between EFSA conclusions on MRL reviews and actual food sector's conditions.
· Consequences like food waste, recalls · Economic damage
· Examples of various shelf-lifes
· Examples of cases where produce could not be sold
· Suggestion for a trade friendly and consumer safe approach
· Reduction of MRLs due to lower LOQs
· Lack of MRL harmonization and consequences

Q+A

Summary of day 1 + housekeeping

Reception

Conversation starter Benefit - Hazard - Risk communication

Walking dinner

End of day 1

Day 02 - 11 June

Registration & Snacks

Welcome to day 2 and housekeeping

Session 3: Why crop protection? Why different needs?

Crop protection needs in the EU and around the world

· What are the challenges in the different countries, Different pests, weeds and fungi in general and due to climate change
· Perception of CP in different countries
· Challenges for good CP due to loss of various a.s. in the EU
· Consequences of loss of a.s. in the EU
· Resistance management
· What’s coming in addition to chemical CP? Biopesticides, precision ag,…
· Benefit – hazard – risk
· Importance of minor uses to stakeholders
· Consequences of missing MRLs on minor uses

Q+A

Session 4: MRLs outside the EU-27

GB MRL setting process, timelines and stakeholder

· Process, timelines, stakeholders
· Transparency
· Diverging EU and GB MRLs!
· Adoption process of historical CXLs!

Draft sampling regulation and Increased control measures

· What is coming in the sampling regulation
· Rules to increase frequency regulation
· New monthly agri-fraud publications
· What role plays RASFF?

Q+A

Coffee break

Codex MRLs

· Observation of changes in CXL adoption rates by EU and GB
· Potential reasons in different requirements
· General adoption rates of countries and how to increase them
· How to enhance Codex output

· How do other jurisdictions handle MRL changes, deferral periods and transitional measures
· Different data requirements leading to diverging MRLs
· Numerical MRL changes confuse FVC

Q+A

Light Lunch

Session 5: Monitoring and enforcement

Draft sampling regulation and Increased control measures

· What is coming in the sampling regulation
· Rules to increase frequency regulation
· New monthly agri-fraud publications
· What role plays RASFF?

Official monitoring

· Most recent pesticide residue monitoring data
· Monitoring of processed products
· How to apply the best processing factor
· Use of monitoring data for cumulative assessment
· Measurement uncertainty

Private monitoring

· Most recent data
· How to enforce low MRLs like 0.005 mg/kg in a daily routine
· How to decide which a.s. to analyze?
· Challenges in sampling
· Challenges for processed commodities
· Complex residue definitions
· Private standards
· Measurement uncertainty
· Reacting to alerts

Q+A

Summary of workshop and close

End of workshop