Director General, CropLife Europe
· Description of different routine MRL setting processes i.e. art. 6 including timelines · Steps where stakeholders can get information and access documents · What changed since March 2021 by introducing transparency regulation and IUCLID · Default MRL policy · How to streamline MRL setting process? · ALARA principle · Rules for applicability of new MRLs
Technical Expert - Consumer Risk Assessment, Syngenta
· Annex I category feed and fish· Annex VI – processing factors · Dual use and triple use a.s. · Former a.s. still falling under 396/2005 · Annex IV and biopesticides · Footnote 1 to Annex I · Multiple source substances
Technical Expert - Consumer Risk Assessment, Syngenta
· Sanitary and phytosanitary topics of relevance
Technical Expert - Consumer Risk Assessment, Syngenta
· Reasons for MRL changes, especially lowering of MRLs, e.g. expiry, non-renewals, targeted reviews, art. 12 · Process and rules · Deferral period and transitional measures · WTO SPS obligations · Steps where stakeholders can learn about upcoming MRL changes · New wording for transitional measures and consequences for EU and non-EU produced food and feed · Consideration of aspects like consumer safety and “formal” MRL changes
· Current observations like no opinion in SCoPAFF and objections by EP · How to deal with current pressure from different angles · Environmental concerns of global dimension · Consequences of losing MRLs for trade · Level playing field argument · Mirror measure discussions and potential impacts · WTO SPS obligations · Why using the MRL process to address 1107/2009 issues · Current Specific trade concern discussion at WTO on MRLs
· How to keep EU market attractive enough for third country operators? · Dependency of EU agriculture on import and export · Discrepancies between EFSA conclusions on MRL reviews and actual food sector's conditions. · Consequences like food waste, recalls · Economic damage · Examples of various shelf-lifes · Examples of cases where produce could not be sold · Suggestion for a trade friendly and consumer safe approach · Reduction of MRLs due to lower LOQs · Lack of MRL harmonization and consequences
· What are the challenges in the different countries, Different pests, weeds and fungi in general and due to climate change · Perception of CP in different countries · Challenges for good CP due to loss of various a.s. in the EU · Consequences of loss of a.s. in the EU · Resistance management · What’s coming in addition to chemical CP? Biopesticides, precision ag,… · Benefit – hazard – risk · Importance of minor uses to stakeholders · Consequences of missing MRLs on minor uses
· Process, timelines, stakeholders · Transparency · Diverging EU and GB MRLs! · Adoption process of historical CXLs!
· What is coming in the sampling regulation· Rules to increase frequency regulation · New monthly agri-fraud publications · What role plays RASFF?
· Observation of changes in CXL adoption rates by EU and GB · Potential reasons in different requirements · General adoption rates of countries and how to increase them · How to enhance Codex output
· How do other jurisdictions handle MRL changes, deferral periods and transitional measures · Different data requirements leading to diverging MRLs · Numerical MRL changes confuse FVC
· What is coming in the sampling regulation· Rules to increase frequency regulation · New monthly agri-fraud publications · What role plays RASFF?
· Most recent pesticide residue monitoring data · Monitoring of processed products · How to apply the best processing factor · Use of monitoring data for cumulative assessment · Measurement uncertainty
· Most recent data · How to enforce low MRLs like 0.005 mg/kg in a daily routine · How to decide which a.s. to analyze? · Challenges in sampling · Challenges for processed commodities · Complex residue definitions · Private standards · Measurement uncertainty · Reacting to alerts